Hot Reads

Showing posts with label popcult. Show all posts
Showing posts with label popcult. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Movie Tuesday: Interstellar

The ships in Interstellar weren't CGI.
Interstellar, like almost all movies was a mixed bag of good and bad elements.  Unlike most movies, however, the mix was fairly even – almost exactly as much good as bad!  As this is a movie review, beware of spoilers.  Interstellar is a science fiction movie about Cooper, a former NASA test pilot who works as a farmer, in a time when widespread crop failure due to pollution of the atmosphere means almost everybody has to farm.  The premise didn’t threaten my suspension of disbelief, and the comments made by Cooper’s father about how when he was a kid they “invented something new every day” had real verisimilitude. 

So the movie continues, and asks you to accept that a wormhole appeared, implies that aliens put it there, and that they flew people into it and discovered planets.  This all was easy enough to accept, in a science fiction movie.  But then the professor tells us he is working to create anti-gravity machines.  Although it turned out to be a lie, at the time, it was just a little too much to swallow.  So Cooper gets launched into space on the (rather un-aerodynamic looking) “Ranger”, and we get our first good look at the best thing the movie has going for it – the visuals.  Specifically, the physical models of spacecraft built and filmed with real cameras.  And it looked amazing, better than any CGI spaceship.  <3

After the all-too-short intermission where the film is not straining credibility, they have the planets orbit a black hole.  Not that it’s impossible, just that the aliens who built the wormhole couldn’t build one that lead to a better solar system?  The real problem with this sequence is that they had absolutely no plan.  Apparently they just built this multi-billion dollar spacecraft and launched into a wormhole hoping the people would just figure it out.  Generally expensive expeditions of any kind, particularly space missions, are planned out in detail.  Like which places they are going to go to.  Also, why did the Ranger have to get launched on a rocket at the beginning, but it could fly onto orbit on its own later, on a planet with “130% Earth’s gravity”?

But once you get over that, the movie actually starts to get pretty exciting, with two genuinely intriguing revelations.  First that the professor never thought the gravity machine was going to work, and that the astronaut Mann lied that his planet was habitable.  The film picked up pace, raised thoughtful questions, and some of Mann’s dialogue in particular was excellent.  The docking sequences were thrilling, and I thought the movie might just make up for some of its weirdness at the beginning.  Unfortunately the film makes the decision not to come to an end.  It then continues not ending for a painfully long time, until it has been sucked dry of any mystery or profundity.

Final score: 6/10 Just About Faboo


What did you think of Interstellar?  What about space, science fiction in general? Tell us in the comments, and have a so super faboo day!

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Movie Tuesday: Drive

Looks pretty good.

Hey everyone, and welcome to Movie Tuesday, a new series of movie reviews on popular (or not!) movies. This weeks edition is Drive, an artistic film starring Ryan Gosling as (according to IMDB) a 'mysterious Hollywood Stuntman.'

This is one movie I'm not going to sugarcoat.

Drive was somehow boring, and too violent at the same time. I'm not one to dislike violence in a movie; Fury was pretty enjoyable, and you see half a face sitting inside a tank in one of the first few scenes. However, Drive took this to the next level with a scene consisting of Ryan Gosling kicking in someone's head in an elevator for what felt like an hour.

Besides just being...violent, to say the least, it was also immensely boring. I zoned out sometime in the middle, and had to look up the synopsis afterwards. (Which happened to not sound anything like what I had seen.)

The filmography only emphasized this. The characters were too quiet, the actors showed no emotion (Besides the horrified expression of Irene throughout the entire movie)  despite Carey Mulligan's stellar performance in Never Let Me Go, a film adapted from the book by Kazuo Ishiguro. The constant color-correction (every scene is a new color!) just goes to show how it was meant as a crowd pleaser.

I did however, enjoy the - theme? - of the movie, or at least the subject matter. Crime is generally a good start to a film, however, the realism of this movie went too far. It seemed so real, it wasn't real at all anymore. (Sort of like uncanny valley.)

In my opinion, a movie should have a little bit of every genre. Drive could have been the gritty and dark indie film it was, while retaining some properties of adventure, or maybe even, dare I say it, a joke.

All in all, Drive was trying to be an artsy, deep movie, and they got artsy down, they just forgot to give it an actual message. That being said, I rate it...

3/10 Not Faboo

Regardless, my Movie Tuesday reviews are a work of opinion. A person could very well appreciate this movie much more than I, and like it for the reasons I dislike it.

Have you seen Drive? What's your opinion on the movie, Love it, Hate it, In-between? Disagree with this review? What movie should be reviewed next? Tell us below in the comments, and as always, have a so super faboo day!
Copyright © 2014 SoSuperFaboo
- Published By Gooyaabi Templates | Powered By Blogger